From the same site which you referred to, I give the definition of “seminal” -
1. pertaining to, containing, or consisting of semen.
2. Botany. of or pertaining to seed.
3. having possibilities of future development.
4. highly original and influencing the development of future events: a seminal artist; seminal ideas.
Clearly, the phrase “far-reaching” which you used here should not be be taken literally. Just paraphrasing the word and giving the opposite to the literal meaning of the phrase in this case leads to an “antonym” which is NOT the antonym of the original word. If someone did some “non-seminal” work, we would call it derivative, not stifling.
In this case, it is plain WRONG to say that.
The previous sentence is remarkably rude when used like this – i.e. between two people who aren’t acquainted. Hence the “I beg to differ, claim that it is not” – it is plain manners.
You seem to prefer I be rude. Hence I repeat the statement – “Stifling is NOT the opposite of seminal. Something like ‘Derivative’ would be the opposite of seminal. The question is incorrect as given. You ought to do some more research before giving questions – like actually reading something about the usage of the words. Blindly cramming what is given in word lists and giving grotesquely contorted perceived “antonyms” isn’t a nice way of making questions” – Sheesh…
Post Comments